عناصر مشابهة
حديث "أد الأمانة إلى من ائتمنك ولا تخن من خانك": دراسة حديثية وفقهية
| المصدر: | مجلة جامعة طيبة للآداب والعلوم الإنسانية |
|---|---|
| الناشر: |
جامعة طيبة - كلية الآداب والعلوم الإنسانية
|
| المؤلف الرئيسي: | |
| المجلد/العدد: | مج4, ع7 |
| محكمة: | نعم |
| الدولة: | السعودية |
| التاريخ الميلادي: | 2015 |
| التاريخ الهجري: | 1436 |
| الصفحات: | 3 - 92 |
| ISSN: | 1658-6662 |
| رقم MD: | 773476 |
| نوع المحتوى: | بحوث ومقالات |
| اللغة: | Arabic |
| قواعد المعلومات: | HumanIndex AraBase |
| مواضيع: | |
| رابط المحتوى: |
|
| المستخلص: | هذا ملخص لتخريج حيث " أد الأمانة إلى من ائتمنك، ولا تخن من خانك". وهو حديث من الأحاديث المشهورة بين المسلمين عامة وبين أهل الحديث وأهل الفقه. ودراستي لهذا الحديث هي دراسة حديثية وفقهية. فهذا الحديث كثيرا ما يستدل به على منع الانتصاف من الظالم في الحقوق المالية، مع أن هناك نصوصا أخرى صحيحة من السنة النبوية ومن القرآن الكريم تفيد جواز ذلك، وهي أكثر وأشهر. فلما رأيت استدلال بعض أهل العلم بهذا الحديث مع معارضته للنصوص المبيحة لأخذ الحق الذي عند الغير رأيت الحاجة ماسة لدراسة هذا الحديث والحكم عليه بما يليق. فقمت، بجمع طرق هذا الحديث، وحكمت فيها على رجال الأسانيد بما يليق بهم. All Praise Be to Allah Lords of the Worlds, And Prayer and Pease Be Upon our Prophet Mohammad(S) This is an abstract for a study on the narration and authority of the Hadith (Saying): “Return the trust to those who entrusted you, and do not betray even the one who broke his promise to you”. This is a famous hadith that is known by Muslims at large and by the hadith scholars and the scholars of the Islamic Jurisprudence. My research to this hadith is related to both aspects; the citation/narration and the jurisprudence. In many cases, people use this hadith to infer a ruling that prevents getting financial rights from the oppressors/aggressors in financial dealings, even though there are much more evidences -which are even better known -from the Quran and correct narrations of the Prophet’s Sunna that allows it. When I saw how some scholars use this hadith as an evidence in this matter although it is at conflict with other evidences that make it permissible to take the financial rights from the others (oppressors), I found that it was of great necessity (need) to study the hadith and come to a conclusion that is more suitable. I have collated the various narrations of this hadith and based on that made a more accurate and fair judgment regarding the people that authorised (narrated) it. I have concluded that the scholars are at dispute in regards to this hadith whether it is correct or weak. I have recorded who judged it as a ‘correct’ hadith and who judged it as a ‘weak’ one. I have found that the Scholars who judged it as a ‘week’ hadith were correct/more accurate in their conclusion after examining the different narrations of the hadith itself And due to the fact that the evidences from the Holy Book (Quran) and the Sunna allow taking the financial rights from others (oppressors). I have also talked about what benefits, rulings and issues that the hadith contained. I Also talked in details about a famous issue that is known amongst scholars which is called: “The issue of A1 Thafr (The issue of someone taking his rights from someone with his own hands or without his knowledge if he can’t get it otherwise) I have also mentioned the points of agreement and disagreement between scholars, and the results suggest to the researcher that it is permissible to take the financial rights and seek justice from the oppressor/aggressor. Prayer, Peace and Blessings be Upon our Prophet Mohammad and Upon His Family and Companions. |
|---|
