عناصر مشابهة
Metadiscourse on Learners
| المصدر: | مجلة كلية الآداب والعلوم الإنسانية |
|---|---|
| الناشر: |
جامعة قناة السويس - كلية الآداب والعلوم الإنسانية
|
| المؤلف الرئيسي: | |
| المجلد/العدد: | ع6 |
| محكمة: | نعم |
| الدولة: | مصر |
| التاريخ الميلادي: | 2013 |
| الصفحات: | 343 - 360 |
| ISSN: | 2536-9458 |
| رقم MD: | 754054 |
| نوع المحتوى: | بحوث ومقالات |
| قواعد المعلومات: | AraBase HumanIndex |
| مواضيع: | |
| رابط المحتوى: |
|
| المستخلص: | This research-work aims at studying the use of metadiscourse markers by I foreign learners of Arabic to enhance their writing skills. First there is an I introduction which explains the role of metadiscourse markers in writing | within the framework of the two paradigms of meaning suggested by Halliday. i.e. the textual and the interspersonal. One hypothesis on which the research-work is built is spelled out. This hypothesis postulates that foreign learners of Arabic acquire solid knowledge of the four categories of markers that fall within the two paradigmatic classifications; their performance in writing will be improved significantly in comparison with those who did not acquire such knowledge. Before examining this hypothesis, the research provides a full-fledged account of four basic types of metadiscourse markers and their equivalents in Arabic. Then it sets out to check the two afore -mentioned hypotheses. In order to verify the hypothesis mentioned above; the foreign learners of Arabic will be able to improve their performance in writing significantly by mastering the use of metadiscourse markers, an experimental methodology is applied. Two groups of non-native Arabic learners are selected randomly, one serving as a control class and the other serving as an experimental class. The results show that following a post-test given to both groups, the writing level of the experimental group, who analyzed and learned metadiscourse markers, comes out higher than that of the control group, who did not go through this experience . |
|---|
