عناصر مشابهة
اتجاهات الخروج من السلاح إلى السياسة في العالم العربي
| العنوان بلغة أخرى: | From Arms to Politics Approaches in the Arab World |
|---|---|
| المصدر: | مجلة دراسات شرق أوسطية |
| الناشر: |
مركز دراسات الشرق الاوسط
|
| المؤلف الرئيسي: | |
| المجلد/العدد: | مج20, ع75 |
| محكمة: | نعم |
| الدولة: | الأردن |
| التاريخ الميلادي: | 2016 |
| الصفحات: | 133 - 141 |
| DOI: | 10.12816/0025014 |
| ISSN: | 1811-8208 |
| رقم MD: | 720307 |
| نوع المحتوى: | بحوث ومقالات |
| اللغة: | Arabic |
| قواعد المعلومات: | HumanIndex EcoLink |
| مواضيع: | |
| رابط المحتوى: |
|
| المستخلص: | The political crises in Libya, Syria and Yemen represent different types of dilemmas in the transition from armed conflict to a non-violence stage. A number of factors intertwine to make the socio-political scene. However, the current reality indicates that the situation in the three countries constitute sophisticated confrontations, where the major parties may not easily accept any settlement. This is essentially attributed to political contradictions, which led to institutional and social divisions. The attempts to end the armed conflict were sometimes hampered by legal and political disputes. Regardless of the ignored national initiatives for this end, the UN policy of dialogue management caused split within the operating state institutions as well as between the different parties. The report concludes that the fundamental common feature is the national parties' inability to put an end to the crisis, for they depend on foreign support. If the situation persists, as the indicators show, the armed conflict will go on. Furthermore, the proposed solutions, so far, cannot address such sophisticated issues. In spite of the dangling political situation and military balance in each case, the possibilities of transition to politics are greater in Libya, due to the UN's inclination to back the national unity government. However, suggesting federalism in the cases of Syria and Yemen would re-produce the armed conflict. |
|---|
