عناصر مشابهة
الخلاف النحوي في كي
| المصدر: | مجلة القادسية للعلوم الإنسانية |
|---|---|
| الناشر: |
جامعة القادسية - كلية الآداب
|
| المؤلف الرئيسي: | |
| المجلد/العدد: | مج 11, ع 1,2 |
| محكمة: | نعم |
| الدولة: | العراق |
| التاريخ الميلادي: | 2008 |
| الصفحات: | 105 - 118 |
| ISSN: | 1991-7805 |
| رقم MD: | 323466 |
| نوع المحتوى: | بحوث ومقالات |
| قواعد المعلومات: | HumanIndex |
| مواضيع: | |
| رابط المحتوى: |
| المستخلص: | تناول البحث الجهد الدلالي عند عالم أصولي ينماز بسعة الأفق، وهو الخميني، وذلك بالوقوف على قضية المجاز عنده. فبين الباحث ماهية المجاز عنده، وأثر الادعاء في تفسير النص المجاز، وموقفه من الحذف والقرينة، في سبيل معرفة ما ينماز بحثه عن غيره من البلاغيين واللغويين والأصوليين، ومدى تأثير البلاغيين فيه. واتضح من الدراسة أن ما يظن مجازا ما هي إلا حقيقة عند الخميني. ومرجعيته في ذلك قائمة على فكرة الادعاء في تفسير النص المجاز التي وضع جذورها السكاكي، وطورها الخميني. Praise be to Allah ,prayer and peace to His Messenger Mohammad and his family virtuous and kinds. Never Arabs grammarians were been controlled by one understand for the problem or one viewpoint gathering them in discussion part of grammar cases ,may be the nature of this science "syntax" helped them ,differential mind directions ,in addition to the scientific competition. Who meditate the contradiction cases in Arabic syntax ,found already interaction of aspects and notions one grammarian doctrine level ,or for the grammarian themselves. My really causes for chosen the research entitled "the grammarian conflict in that " the conflicted books never mentioned all the related conflicts connected with (that) ,A1- Anbary (death 577 D.H.) he didn't mention except tow cases ,and Abull Latif Al-Sharji (death 802 A.H.) Whereas the conflict in "That" is more than he mentioned. The research nature required to be on four themes then conclusion: For the preface ,I discussed "That" as Samian languages "Where I showed its source in samic language ,for the themes are: - the first name :the conflict in grammarian works .I deal with grammarians conflicts in grammarians works of "That" for them. second them :the conflict in the subjunctive verb after "that" I clarified the conflicts of the grammarians in the text element for the valid after that ,after it tow items: subjunctival is "that" itself, the subjunctive "to" implicit". - third themes :showing "to" after "that" between the permissibility or nonbeing in this case on tow pinions are: not being allowable showing to after that,possible to show it after "that". - fourth theme :the conflict in separating that of its produced ,this theme has tow cases are :the conflict in that works after separation of its produced reparation between "that" and its produced without " What" negation ,then the conclusion where I deal with the most results which the researcher achieved to. |
|---|
