عناصر مشابهة
المفهوم الإسرائيلي للسلام مع الفلسطينيين في عهد كديما
| العنوان بلغة أخرى: | Israeli Concept Of Peace With Palestinians |
|---|---|
| المصدر: | مجلة دراسات شرق أوسطية |
| الناشر: |
مركز دراسات الشرق الاوسط
|
| المؤلف الرئيسي: | |
| المجلد/العدد: | مج 12, ع 44 |
| محكمة: | نعم |
| الدولة: | الأردن |
| التاريخ الميلادي: | 2008 |
| الصفحات: | 83 - 110 |
| ISSN: | 1811-8208 |
| رقم MD: | 202265 |
| نوع المحتوى: | بحوث ومقالات |
| قواعد المعلومات: | EcoLink HumanIndex |
| مواضيع: |
مفاوضات السلام
| الصراع العربي الإسرائيلي
| القضية الفلسطينية
| السياسة الإسرائيلية
| الفكر السياسي
| التسوية السلمية
| الفلسطينيون
| الأحزاب السياسية
| حزب كديما
| البرامج السياسية
| الانتخابات الإسرائيلية
| شارون ، آرييل ، رئيس الوزراء الإسرائيلي
| أولمرت ، إيهود
| ليفني ، تسيبي ، وزيرة الخارجية الإسرائيلية
|
| رابط المحتوى: |
|
| المستخلص: | Kadyma party was established in 2005 due to many changes on political field in Israel. But, this party failed since its leader hasn't made any serious changes in peace with Palestinians. This might be because of the absence of its establisher Areil Sharon who made critical changes regarding the peace with Palestinians. He adopted the concept of David Bengurion, and followed a tough policy toward the Palestinians. Now, the existing leader Ehoud Olmert failed to affect the Israeli political field because of his failure in two wars: Lebanon and Gaza. Olmert also is exposed to several accusations regarding the corruption. The third leader in the party, Tzipi Livni, failed to play that role, because she hasn't got long experience or a proper opportunity to make any effects. Sharon affected the electoral platform of Kadima party; he tried to seize the local and international opportunities to force the Palestinians to accept the Israeli demands. At first, he tried to leave a initial impression to show that he works for establishing the Palestinian State beside Israel. Ehoud Olmert followed that view but he didn't add any more than Sharon. As he tried to present new ideas as a result of the Intifada, he hasn't in fact applied it on the ground. On the other hand, when Lifni tried to make a distinguished approach, she found one way; she presented a peace initiative and emphasized that Israel will affect its interests negatively, if it makes a declaration about its nuclear weapon. |
|---|
