عناصر مشابهة
إشتراط الإجماع بين قضاء المحكمة العليا في عقوبات القتل تعزيرا
| المصدر: | العدل |
|---|---|
| الناشر: |
وزارة العدل
|
| المؤلف الرئيسي: | |
| المجلد/العدد: | مج 14, ع 54 |
| محكمة: | نعم |
| الدولة: | السعودية |
| التاريخ الميلادي: | 2012 |
| التاريخ الهجري: | 1433 |
| الصفحات: | 91 - 122 |
| ISSN: | 1319-8386 |
| رقم MD: | 183697 |
| نوع المحتوى: | بحوث ومقالات |
| قواعد المعلومات: | IslamicInfo |
| مواضيع: | |
| رابط المحتوى: |
|
| المستخلص: | A discretionary punishment is the one that is not provided for textually. \ In the Kuwaiti Encyclopedia of Jurisprudence it is defined as a punishment that is not determined by the provisions of Sharee’ah which is the right of Allah or a human being for a sin for which there is no textual punishment or redemption. \ Discretionary punishments cover physical ones such as the capital crime or whipping. \ The most important recommendations and conclusions of the study include the following: \ Discretionary punishments are legitimate and the judge may choose the proper punishment. \ A discretionary punishment is subject to pardoning by the ruler contrary to textual punishments which cannot be pardoned by the ruler. \ A criminal may be punished by a discretionary capital punishment. \ Discretionary whipping may be of any number of whips provided that a discretionary punishment does not exceed the textual punishment of a rime of the same nature. \ According to Islamic jurisprudence, there is no objection to have more than one court; namely degrees of litigation. \ To err in pardoning is better than to err in punishment |
|---|
