عناصر مشابهة
انفرادات حفص في القراءة عن عاصم وأثرها في التفسير
| المصدر: | مجلة كلية البنات الإسلامية بأسيوط |
|---|---|
| الناشر: |
جامعة الأزهر - كلية البنات الإسلامية بأسيوط
|
| المؤلف الرئيسي: | |
| المجلد/العدد: | ع16, ج2 |
| محكمة: | نعم |
| الدولة: | مصر |
| التاريخ الميلادي: | 2019 |
| الصفحات: | 1400 - 1519 |
| DOI: | 10.21608/mkba.2019.61056 |
| ISSN: | 1110-3906 |
| رقم MD: | 1029325 |
| نوع المحتوى: | بحوث ومقالات |
| اللغة: | Arabic |
| قواعد المعلومات: | IslamicInfo |
| مواضيع: | |
| رابط المحتوى: |
| المستخلص: | This summary consists of three topics: Firstly: Its idea which becomes very clear through the title which is: “The points of differences in the reading of Hafs which makes him different from Assim and the influence of this on the interpretation of the Holy Qura’n”. This is a collection of the points of difference in the reading of Hafs Ibn Soliman which makes him different from his Sheikh (master) Assim Ibn Aby Al- Nojod other than the ten readers. I tried putting this in a separate work to make studying or memorizing it easier for the seekers of knowledge. Secondly: Which is the conclusion of study which found that Hafs isn’t much different from the community of readers except for very few positions not more than thirty three points in twenty five Surrah of the Holy Qura’n. They are: Al-Bakare, Al-Imran, Al-Nissa, Al-Maeda,Al-Araf,Al-Anfal, Yonous, Houd, Yosouf, Al-Esraa, Alkahf, Maryam, Al-Anbia, Alhaj, Al-Nour, Al-Forqan, Al-Sho’ara, Al-Kassas, Al-room, Al-Ahzab, Ghafer, Al-Fat’h, Al-Talak, Al-ma’arej, Al-Ikhlas. He is in total agreement with the other readers in the rest of the Holy Qura’n. This proves that the differences are very few. Thirdly: Which is the supreme aim of this study which is the differences in the reading of Hafs and its effect on the interpretation and showing if there is any difference between Hafs and the other readers. These differences were divided into two sections: The first section where he agreed with the other community of readers about the meaning of nearly agreed with them such as the reading of the verse: "in the same way of متاع الحياة الدنيا Yonoss 23" pronunciation. As in: "As well as Al- Ma'arej 16 سواء العاكف Al-Haj 25" "In these positions Hafs agreed with others نزاعة للشورى" about meaning. The section where he has difference in Al- Anfal 18 where "موهن كيد الكافرين" meaning such as in he meant by not doubling the /n/ sound is that weakness is in the present time. The other community of readers "with doubling the sound /n/ which موهن pronounced it" meant that weakness occurs in the future and so is the rest. The conclusion is that the points where Hafs is different in the way of reading and not the meaning is a kind of variety and not due to any contradictions in meaning. Whereas the points of difference in reading and meaning refer to the completion of the two ways of reading where every way if reading has its separate meaning which is not contradicted with the other reading. I pray God to make my work sincere for serving his word and for his absolute greatness. I wish my work will benefit Islam and Muslims since God is absolutely capable of doing everything. |
|---|
