عناصر مشابهة
شعرية الحوار
| العنوان بلغة أخرى: | Poetic of Dialogue |
|---|---|
| المصدر: | فصول |
| الناشر: |
الهيئة المصرية العامة للكتاب
|
| المؤلف الرئيسي: | |
| المجلد/العدد: | ع98 |
| محكمة: | نعم |
| الدولة: | مصر |
| التاريخ الميلادي: | 2017 |
| الصفحات: | 67 - 91 |
| ISSN: | 1110-0702 |
| رقم MD: | 892528 |
| نوع المحتوى: | بحوث ومقالات |
| اللغة: | Arabic |
| قواعد المعلومات: | AraBase |
| مواضيع: | |
| رابط المحتوى: |
|
| المستخلص: | This research uncovers relationship between dialogue and its origins oral, speech, and examines aspects of the relationship between oral and written dialogue, and clarifies the differences between its theatrical and narrative uses, and compares diverse textual dialogues to note fixed features, which allow characterization and classification of dialogue as a genre. Critics approach dialogue differently because of its being not an independent until in all texts, it is scattered in narrative authoring however, dialogue is the corner stone in theatrical writing, but will the nature of dialogue changes if it shares another one in the text? The classic theater has been poetic; it is displayed and un narrated poetry, dialogue, and story. So why do we consider the dialogue as a subsidiary while the others are genres? Moreover, in what does the dialogue differ in the novel, drama, cinema, and real life? Does the difference exists in nature, mode or in the performance? Indeed, the study of the dialogue is still crawling around in the narrative and theatrical theories, which confined their attention in structure, which includes limited number of items, and equated between events and actions, though the event, can also be verbal. This orientation has led to the delay of theoretical research in the dialogue, so that its study continued to conduct in accordance with partial concepts which hides the gains made by modem theories of discourse; pragmatism at the top. |
|---|
